Tendering development finance in the banking market

Tendering development finance does not mean asking several banks for a quote. It means organising competition so the offers become comparable at all – and so that in the end it is not only the margin but the whole structure that fits the project. A property developer set up exactly this process in the German banking market for a large-volume debt facility, and had it run externally.

Starting position

A development project needed a tailored financing structure. Requirements came from three directions at once: from the project itself with its cost and time profile, from the market with its prevailing terms, and from the lenders with their individual credit and security requirements.

Developers who negotiate bilaterally with a single bank in this situation are structurally in the weaker position: without a comparable offer there is no reference point, and without a timetable the bank sets the pace.

The brief

Structuring, tendering and negotiating the debt facility through to financial close:

• Preparing and running a structured tender process across the German banking landscape
• Producing the financing documentation: business plan, financial model, project and security structure
• Analysing and comparing incoming offers on commercial, structural and legal grounds
• Developing the target financing structure including covenants, security package, drawdown conditions and cash flow mechanics
• Steering the process between developer, banks, legal and technical advisers
• Supporting term sheet negotiation and final financing documentation
• Accompanying credit approval and due diligence through to financial close

The financing process step by step

One documentation package for every recipient

Before any approach came the preparation: business plan, financial model, project and security structure in a form every bank could review without a round of follow-up questions. The effect is twofold – credit processes start faster, and the offers become comparable because they rest on identical assumptions.

Selecting recipients rather than broadcasting

Not every bank finances every project. The approach targeted institutions whose risk appetite, ticket size and experience with comparable developments matched the scheme. An approach that is too broad generates rejections that become visible in the market – and weakens the negotiating position.

Compare offers structurally, not just on price

The comparison covered every relevant dimension: margin and commitment fees, but equally covenants, security package, drawdown conditions and cash flow mechanics. A cheap offer with tight drawdown conditions can prove more expensive during construction than a nominally dearer one with workable release mechanics – a difference that only shows up in execution.

Negotiation as an organised process

Term sheets were run in parallel, not sequentially. Coordination between developer, banks, legal advisers and technical advisers stayed in one pair of hands throughout – as did credit approval and due diligence support up to drawdown.

When tendering development finance pays off

Not every scheme justifies the effort. A structured process pays for itself above a size where a difference of a few basis points exceeds the process cost – which is regularly the case for large-volume developments. It also pays where the project has features not every bank underwrites: mixed use, building within existing fabric, longer pre-letting periods or sites with contamination issues.

Conversely, bilateral negotiation with the house bank can be the faster route where a solid relationship exists and the scheme fits the standard template. What matters is making that choice deliberately rather than by habit – and, in the bilateral case, at least obtaining one comparative indication to benchmark the terms.

Outcome

The process delivered competitive financing terms alongside a structurally optimised facility. The decisive factor was linking both objectives: terms can be negotiated where genuine competition exists – structure can be shaped where your own requirements are defined in advance.

What developers take from this

• Competition is created through organisation. Without a timetable and consistent documentation there are no comparable offers.
• Choosing who to approach is part of the negotiation. Targeted outreach yields better terms than broad distribution.
• Financial close is its own workstream. Between term sheet and drawdown lies documentation work that ties up capacity.

The profile this mandate requires

What is needed is someone who knows both sides of the table: the credit logic of banks – security, debt service capacity, internal approval routes – and the developer's project view. Plus confidence in financial modelling and experience negotiating term sheets and financing documentation.

Mandates like this are regularly awarded to experienced freelancers who have run such processes for years. For companies explains what that means in practice; our process describes the steps.

Related project stories: interim commercial leadership and capital structuring and acquiring and financing a retail portfolio.